|
|
Audit and Logistical Control
Scholar Year: 2018/2019 - 2S
| Code: |
LGDLP1590 |
|
Acronym: |
AL |
| Scientific Fields: |
Gestão Logística |
Courses
| Acronym |
Nº of students |
Study Plan |
Curricular year |
ECTS |
Contact hours |
Total Time |
| LGDLPL |
15 |
Study Plain |
3º |
4,5 |
|
|
Teaching language
Portuguese
Intended learning outcomes (Knowledges, skills and competencies to be developed by the students)
• Know the components of a system of audit and control logistics
• Know the rules of the system implementation, monitoring methodologies, monitoring and reporting the
performance of logistics processes
• Contribute to the organizational understanding, problem solving and decision-making and appropriate use of information technologies and specific communication;
• Understand, assess and control the total logistics costs;
• Meet auditing techniques and knowledge to establish logistics, analysis and control of logistics performance
indicators.
Syllabus
- Systems Audit and logistical control: framework and historical evolution.
- Alignment with strategic objectives.
- Benchmarking.
- Needs assessment and establishment of performance targets.
- Systems audit logistics and quality systems and continuous improvement.
- Techniques of survey procedures.
- Technical auditing logistics.
- Analysis, identification and control of total logistics costs;
- Determination and refinement of indicators of logistics performance.
- Methodologies for control, monitoring and reporting
Demonstration of the syllabus coherence with the UC intended learning outcomes
Studying, in a theoretical and practical components, on the development and implementation of a logistical
control system, the respective methodologies of performance, showing his quality regulatory framework in and
around the field of management of business organizations
Teaching methodologies
Theoretical / practical: methods of exposition, demonstration and experimental, by performing specific
exercises and operations.
Demonstration of the teaching methodologies coherence with the curricular unit's intended learning outcomes
The teaching methods are based on theoretical and practical components. Given the nature of the discipline,
the explanation of theoretical concepts underlying the various dimensions that contribute to the fundamentals
of management, the various stackholders and interactions is essential. Similarly, evidence and indicators
applied to training exercises, whether in the classroom and / or applied to work in groups, are essential for the perception of the importance and correct choice of indicators for assessment and control in terms of technical audit logistics.
Assessment methodologies and evidences
Continuous evaluation:
a) Working Group (WG), consisting of written report, oral presentation and discussion, with 35% weighting
towards the final grade
b) Case study (CS), consisting of written report, oral presentation and discussion, with 15% weighting
towards the final grade
c) Implement a single written test, weighted 50% towards the final grade
Final Score = 0.35 (WG) + 0,15 CS + 0.50 (Test)
If a), b) or b) is less than 10 values, the student must perform the final evaluation.
There are three seasons final evaluation:
Regular Season | 1st time (intended for students who did not opt for continuous evaluation)
. Final Examination: If the notice is less than 10 values, there is no approval.
Appeal season | 2nd time (intended for students who did not attend or not obtained at the normal time use or ongoing evaluation)
Evaluation system equal to the final evaluation of the Regular Season
Season Special: The evaluation system equal to the Era of Appeal
Assement and Attendance registers
| Description |
Type |
Tempo (horas) |
End Date |
| Attendance (estimated) |
Classes |
45 |
|
| |
Total: |
45 |
Complementary Bibliography
Lambert, D.M., Stock, J.R., Elram, L.M.;Fundamentals of Logistics Management, McGraw-Hill, 1998 |
Carvalho, José C., Carvalho, Vitor;Auditoria Logística, Sílabo, 2001 |
Carvalho, José Crespo de et al;Logística de Gestão da Cadeia de Abastecimento, Sílabo, 2010 |
Dias, J.C., Quaresma;Logística Global e Macrologistica, Sílabo, 2005 |
Keebler, James et al;Keeping Score - CLM, 1999 |
João Russo;Balanced Scorecard, Lidel, 2009 |
Sinchi-Levi; David&Kaminsky;Designing and Managing the Supply Chain, MacGraw-Hill, 2003 |
Goldsby, Thomas&Martichenko;Lean Six Sigma Logistics, 2005 |
Bolstorff, Peter&Rosenbaum;;Supply Chain Excellence: A Handbook for dramatic improvement using SCOR Model, 2003 |
|
|